Comments on: Too much information http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/2008/05/12/too-much-information/ Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:52:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Random Developments » Canon EOS1000D http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/2008/05/12/too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-21400 Random Developments » Canon EOS1000D Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:38:56 +0000 http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/?p=280#comment-21400 [...] few months ago, I wrote that I was looking for a new camera and that I was reading about several DSLR models. I eventually chose one of them, and during a [...] [...] few months ago, I wrote that I was looking for a new camera and that I was reading about several DSLR models. I eventually chose one of them, and during a [...]

]]> By: Wilson http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/2008/05/12/too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-17192 Wilson Mon, 12 May 2008 13:17:24 +0000 http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/?p=280#comment-17192 Indeed, you're right about the Canon autofocus... funny that I hadn't seen that mentioned anywhere, but I guess that's normal for Canon cameras... The only one with an in-camera drive is the Sony (the drive pin is very visible in the lens mount - and it matches my Minolta). About the Steady Shot feature, yes, that's one more thing making me lean towards the Sonys. Their Dynamic Range Optimisation is another. But I've ready that in-lens stabilisation is more reliable than in-camera, because it can act differently depending on the lens features; still, it does add over $100 per lens for this feature, and the Sonys bring it "for free"... Indeed, you’re right about the Canon autofocus… funny that I hadn’t seen that mentioned anywhere, but I guess that’s normal for Canon cameras… The only one with an in-camera drive is the Sony (the drive pin is very visible in the lens mount – and it matches my Minolta).

About the Steady Shot feature, yes, that’s one more thing making me lean towards the Sonys. Their Dynamic Range Optimisation is another. But I’ve ready that in-lens stabilisation is more reliable than in-camera, because it can act differently depending on the lens features; still, it does add over $100 per lens for this feature, and the Sonys bring it “for free”…

]]> By: Cassio http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/2008/05/12/too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-17191 Cassio Mon, 12 May 2008 11:55:07 +0000 http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/?p=280#comment-17191 s/People say about/People talk about/ s/People say about/People talk about/

]]> By: Cassio http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/2008/05/12/too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-17190 Cassio Mon, 12 May 2008 11:53:29 +0000 http://www.netwhatever.com/randomdev/?p=280#comment-17190 Well, more information for you: - The canon also needs in-lens autofocus motor. People say about this issue in the D60 because other Nikon DSLRS can use the in-lens motor but have an in-camera motor to use old lenses. All new Nikon lenses have autofocus motor in-lens and so do the Canon lenses. Equivalent lens for both systems are equivalent in price. - Sony has in-camera image stabilizing (They call it Steady Shot or SS). It means you'll be able to shot in low-light situations using slower shutter speeds without bluring the photograph. Canon and Nikon provides similar funcionality (IS for Canon and VR for Nikon) with optical (in-lens) stabilization, but you'll have stabilization only when using this (expensiver) lens. Well, more information for you:
- The canon also needs in-lens autofocus motor. People say about this issue in the D60 because other Nikon DSLRS can use the in-lens motor but have an in-camera motor to use old lenses. All new Nikon lenses have autofocus motor in-lens and so do the Canon lenses. Equivalent lens for both systems are equivalent in price.
- Sony has in-camera image stabilizing (They call it Steady Shot or SS). It means you’ll be able to shot in low-light situations using slower shutter speeds without bluring the photograph. Canon and Nikon provides similar funcionality (IS for Canon and VR for Nikon) with optical (in-lens) stabilization, but you’ll have stabilization only when using this (expensiver) lens.

]]>