<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing binoculars &#8211; part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/</link>
	<description>Down Under, Looking Up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>While i agree with everything, my primary asto-binoculars are 8x21.  There are 3 P&#039;s to picking an astronomical instrument.  Price, Portability, and Performance.  These 8x21 roof-prism binoculars cost $50US, weight 3.5 oz (100 grams) and perform nearly as well as much larger binoculars under my heavily light polluted skies.  They&#039;re small enough to fit in a pocket, and so there&#039;s hardly any excuse not to have them.

These days, however, i do more astronomy with a 10 inch (254 mm) reflector.  The 8x21&#039;s are handy for finding daytime planets and larger asterisms.

Saturn is my favorite object for comparison of optics.  Naked eye, it&#039;s a dot.  In 8x21 binoculars, it&#039;s a line.  In a 8x42 binoculars, it has some sort of odd ear like things on it.  In a 22x60 spotting scope, the rings are clear.  In the 240x254 reflector, the Cassini division is evident.  The Huygens probe saw ice rocks 5 cm across on Titan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While i agree with everything, my primary asto-binoculars are 8&#215;21.  There are 3 P&#8217;s to picking an astronomical instrument.  Price, Portability, and Performance.  These 8&#215;21 roof-prism binoculars cost $50US, weight 3.5 oz (100 grams) and perform nearly as well as much larger binoculars under my heavily light polluted skies.  They&#8217;re small enough to fit in a pocket, and so there&#8217;s hardly any excuse not to have them.</p>
<p>These days, however, i do more astronomy with a 10 inch (254 mm) reflector.  The 8&#215;21&#8242;s are handy for finding daytime planets and larger asterisms.</p>
<p>Saturn is my favorite object for comparison of optics.  Naked eye, it&#8217;s a dot.  In 8&#215;21 binoculars, it&#8217;s a line.  In a 8&#215;42 binoculars, it has some sort of odd ear like things on it.  In a 22&#215;60 spotting scope, the rings are clear.  In the 240&#215;254 reflector, the Cassini division is evident.  The Huygens probe saw ice rocks 5 cm across on Titan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 17th Carnival of Space Available</title>
		<link>http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Centauri Dreams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 17th Carnival of Space Available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>[...] The Planetary Society&#8217;s Emily Lakdawalla. Astronomy Down Under offers some useful advice on choosing binoculars for celestial observing, while Brian Wang&#8217;s scenario for space technology in 2057 looks at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Planetary Society&#8217;s Emily Lakdawalla. Astronomy Down Under offers some useful advice on choosing binoculars for celestial observing, while Brian Wang&#8217;s scenario for space technology in 2057 looks at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomy Down Under - Down Under, Looking Up &#187; Choosing binoculars - part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomy Down Under - Down Under, Looking Up &#187; Choosing binoculars - part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2006/06/06/choosing-binoculars-part-1/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] Choosing binoculars - part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Choosing binoculars &#8211; part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

