<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nine, ten, eleven&#8230; how many planets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2005/09/26/nine-ten-eleven-how-many-planets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2005/09/26/nine-ten-eleven-how-many-planets/</link>
	<description>Down Under, Looking Up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomy Down Under - Down Under, Looking Up &#187; Pluto still a planet, probably</title>
		<link>http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2005/09/26/nine-ten-eleven-how-many-planets/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomy Down Under - Down Under, Looking Up &#187; Pluto still a planet, probably</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2005/09/26/nine-ten-eleven-how-many-planets/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] I mentioned a while ago that the IAU was going to decide on an unambiguous definition for the word &#8220;planet&#8221;, and that it was likely that this would change the number of planets in our solar system. The decision has not yet been reached; this should happen later this month. However, several members of the aforementioned panel suggest that Pluto will join a new group called &#8220;dwarf planets&#8221; (we already have &#8220;terrestrial planets&#8221; and &#8220;giant gas planets&#8221;), which might include any body that orbits the Sun and that is large enough that its own gravity makes it spherical (or nearly so); this would include anything larger than some 700km across. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mentioned a while ago that the IAU was going to decide on an unambiguous definition for the word &#8220;planet&#8221;, and that it was likely that this would change the number of planets in our solar system. The decision has not yet been reached; this should happen later this month. However, several members of the aforementioned panel suggest that Pluto will join a new group called &#8220;dwarf planets&#8221; (we already have &#8220;terrestrial planets&#8221; and &#8220;giant gas planets&#8221;), which might include any body that orbits the Sun and that is large enough that its own gravity makes it spherical (or nearly so); this would include anything larger than some 700km across. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astronomy Down Under - Down Under, Looking Up &#187; Looking at Pluto</title>
		<link>http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2005/09/26/nine-ten-eleven-how-many-planets/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Astronomy Down Under - Down Under, Looking Up &#187; Looking at Pluto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwhatever.com/astrodownunder/2005/09/26/nine-ten-eleven-how-many-planets/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Nine, ten, eleven&#8230; how many planets? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nine, ten, eleven&#8230; how many planets? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

